By Manhattan Miami Real Estate
Non-U.S. buyers are granted only a $60,000 estate tax exemption in the United States (estate tax is sometimes informally referred to as a “death tax”).
By contrast, U.S. citizens currently benefit from exemptions of approximately $13M+.
Above that threshold, U.S.-situs assets — including real estate — may be taxed at rates of up to 40%.
Estate tax treaties with certain countries (including the U.K., France, and Germany) may modify how this applies. However, many international buyers do not benefit from treaty protection and are subject to the full exposure.
Key Facts
For a concise brief covering ownership structure, estate tax, and exit considerations: Download the brief →
Quick Answer
Yes. Non-U.S. buyers who own U.S.-situs assets—including real estate—may face U.S. estate tax of up to 40% above a $60,000 exemption. This is a federal tax on the transfer of assets at death, not a state or annual property tax.
How to protect capital from estate tax without losing flexibility.
For non-U.S. buyers, purchasing real estate in the United States introduces a risk that is rarely explained clearly:
U.S. estate tax exposure of up to 40%.
This is one of the most commonly misunderstood aspects of U.S. real estate ownership for international buyers.
Unlike U.S. citizens, foreign individuals are granted only a $60,000 exemption. Above that threshold, U.S.-situated assets — including real estate — may be heavily taxed at death.
On a $5M–$15M property, this is not theoretical. It is a material capital risk.
On higher-value properties, the impact can be substantial. A $10M property owned directly by a foreign individual can create estate tax exposure exceeding $3M, depending on structure.
This is not something that can be corrected after closing.
The way a property is owned from the beginning determines:
The ownership structure is not an afterthought. It is part of the investment decision itself.
For non-resident, non-citizen investors:
This applies regardless of:
There is no one-size solution. Sophisticated buyers typically evaluate three approaches.
Each of these approaches reflects a different priority:
The optimal approach depends on how the investment fits into a broader capital strategy — not just the property itself.
The difference is not the property — it’s what you own at the top of the structure.
Some buyers structure ownership through non-U.S. entities so the asset is not treated as U.S.-situs at death.
This approach can:
However, it may:
Other buyers prioritize simplicity. They purchase directly and use insurance to cover potential estate tax exposure. In practice, insurance availability varies—while younger buyers may find it more accessible, older buyers may face higher costs or limited options, which can influence the overall strategy.
This allows:
However:
Some buyers combine elements of both:
This approach can balance efficiency and flexibility — but must be designed intentionally.
For a broader overview of how international buyers approach U.S. real estate, see our framework for capital deployment in NYC and Miami.
The structures that eliminate estate tax exposure are not the same structures lenders prefer.
This creates a fundamental decision:
The right strategy depends on:
Acquisition costs sit alongside structure as a separate decision — closing costs in NYC and Miami follow a different set of rules.
Many international buyers assume that holding U.S. real estate through an LLC, or placing it in a trust, solves the estate tax problem. On its own, neither does.
Both are domestic ownership wrappers. They do not change how the U.S. classifies the underlying asset for estate tax purposes. If the property remains U.S.-situs, estate tax exposure generally still applies.
To eliminate exposure, the ownership structure itself must change. An LLC or a trust may then be layered on top to provide:
In practice, strategies tend to align with asset size:
Owners weighing a change in residence face a separate set of state-level questions — the NYC-to-Miami tax migration covers that ground.
For high-end Manhattan properties at the trophy tier, structured ownership is the norm rather than the exception.
This is not just tax planning. It is about how capital enters — and eventually exits — the U.S. real estate market.
The wrong structure can create unnecessary exposure. The wrong financing approach can limit flexibility. Both must be considered together.
Every ownership structure depends on how you plan to finance, hold, and eventually exit the investment.
We work with international buyers and their tax and legal advisors to align ownership structure with the overall real estate strategy.
Every engagement begins with a private discussion — objectives, timing, tax posture.
No obligation. Typically replied to within one business day.